Dave Zitting

archives

Comments

I welcome your input and feedback. Comments on the blog are moderated and inappropriate or off-topic comments will not be posted.

Calendar

July 2010
S M T W T F S
« May    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Update:Latest Loan Officer Compensation Legislation

May 25th, 2010 · No Comments

In response to the Senate Bill passed last week (Senate Bill 3217) regarding loan originator compensation, many of you reached out with questions on how this impacts our organization, as well its timing.There have been rumors of this change for months, and PRMI has been closely monitoring the situation since these rumors first began in early 2009.On February 3rd of this year, I issued an update on the status of this legislation, and our response as to it as an organization.We will continue to communicate with you as this initiative moves forward in the coming months, and as we have new information.


 
While we do fully expect that there will be new law that will direct how the industry compensates originators, there is still much work to be done before that Bill is finalized.The Senate Bill still has to be reconciled with the House Bill, and the final version is likely to look different than what was passed last week.Realistically, based on the guidance of our attorneys in Washington D.C., we don’t expect to have to implement any changes for another 18 months.  Nevertheless, we believe that by preparing now, we can make this a great opportunity for our branches by creating a solution that will not only be attractive to our organization’s existing originators, but to new originators who will find PRMI’s resolution superior to that of their current employer.You can feel confident that we will provide both the guidance and the tools to make any changes seamless for both the branch and the originator.
 

This change is just the latest example of regulatory forces that are only getting more sharply focused on how we do business.  This regulatory focus creates a great challenge for all in the industry, and a great opportunity for those few who have connectivity, influence, vision, and the ability to adapt both process and strategy to the new realities.  In our 12 years serving this industry - and never more than in the last 2 years - PRMI has proven to be among those few mortgage banking organizations that have turned industry challenge into a marketplace advantage.

 
As the regulatory environment changes and as PRMI grows, we’ve recognized that we have to stay even more connected to the “street”, both in what’s happening in Washington D.C., as well as in how we keep our Partners informed. 

 

A big part of keeping our Partners connected is including them in how we respond to these changes.  In August of last year, we announced the launch of the Partner Advisory Council (PAC).  The PAC is a committee of Partners from across the country who PRMI relies upon to help “steer the ship” in terms of how our Partners would have us respond to the many industry changes impacting our organization.  The PAC plays a critical role in helping PRMI’s leadership shape our organization in a way that balances the compliance imperatives, with the business needs of our Branch Partners.  The PAC is every Partner’s voice in influencing the direction of this business.  As such, we encourage each of you to keep the lines of communication open with those members so that your voice can be heard on all the changes impacting our business.
 

Adapting effectively to change has been one of the things that defines this organization, and will continue to be our commitment to our Partners on this issue, and any others that may surface. 

→ No CommentsTags: PRMI related

del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com technorati.com   

Is Customer Service Back to Stay?

October 23rd, 2009 · No Comments

Is it just me, or is customer service getting better? Banks, grocery stores, restaurants, even the gas stations seem to have turned over a new leaf in the last few months alone. And not a moment too soon! If customer service didn’t improve in this country I, personally, would have gone bonkers!  

What’s driving this force? It’s simple supply and demand. Businesses are fighting harder for their customers, and businesses are offering jobs to employees who are willing to go the extra mile to keep the consumer happy. Why the sudden jolt? I mean, it’s not like two months ago we realized consumers were tightening their belts and it took coaxing in every market strategy to gain their patronage. Again, it’s as simple as ‘time and focus.’  

Take my company, Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc., for example. Over the last two years we’ve been forced into a massive ‘defensive mode’ – working diligently to maintain strong warehouse capacities, secondary market connectivity and stay on the right side of the greatest consolidation this industry has ever witnessed. To be perfectly honest, service levels were not in the forefront of my daily priorities, and our respected managers nationwide were plenty interested in our focus on maintaining a strong mortgage banking platform.  

Now the dust has settled a bit, there’s new competition, and we are headed into a new era of commerce that will last for at least a decade. With a greater ratio of product choices to available consumers, the concentrated consumer segment nationwide now has the capability to demand quality and service even more now than it had been able to in over a decade. If businesses, and employees of businesses, cannot heed the consumers’ call in every consumer segment – then good luck!  

Test this theory out by going out to a restaurant in downtown San Francisco. It doesn’t matter what type of food, or the name on the door – just pick one, sit down and enjoy. Due to the large number and concentration of available choices (products), and a finite consumer base choosing the product; the result is exceptional food and service at any restaurant that has been open for more than a year in downtown San Francisco. It’s easy to pick cities with the exact opposite dynamics – and with less demand for quality, service ultimately decreases accordingly.  

There is a factor in our ‘new economy’ where these service level pressures will become more prominent in all major and minor markets across our great country. It is the silver lining in economic disruptions that provides the few consumers who are spending money on a better overall experience. Value is key – and consumers will measure and judge value in ways they have not for many years.  

I can assure you that I have a new focus and motivation to raise the bar in a customer service capacity here at Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc. And not just the service levels we provide to the end consumer, but all layers of service provided to our managers, production staff and sales representatives working diligently on a daily basis to attain and win market share!        

→ No CommentsTags: PRMI related

del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com technorati.com   

Hoping For The Preservation of Ideology

February 26th, 2009 · No Comments

Over the last three months I find it more and more difficult to share my opinions and suggestions – thus the latest abandonment of this blog. In addition to my writers block, business has been booming here at PRMI and I find myself simply out of time on a daily basis. I am very proud that this organization is thriving and aiding the American public in refinancing and home purchasing needs in times like this. I am happy to report that PRMI grew 36.25% last year and 2009 has begun with two months of record breaking funding.  

Regarding the short term economic possibilities, I believe the current government actions being taken are the best policies to relieve the clear and present dangers and ultimately stabilize the banking system and real estate markets. I am relatively confident that we will start to see the economy turn the corner by the end of this year. American prosperity should continue to be present in our way of life. The employment numbers are the wildcard, but we need to remember that this category of any economy is one of the last segments to show improvement. There are a lot of positives in the pipe – most of which cannot typically be seen by the general public. However, I’m afraid that the next expansion, when it does come, will not come without an unprecedented price-tag and loss of freedoms. What is to come beyond this chapter in our economic history is completely unknown and we should all be concerned for what our children will be left to deal with. Nationalized banks, massive socialistic programs, sequestered risk strategies – all of which are far from the characteristics within a free market economy and the ‘true value’ that is ultimately established and underwritten by a natural marketplace.   

As a national mortgage banker and a free markets believer, I find myself in a principle laden tug-of-war. Without these government interactions I fear tremendously for what the bottom would look like – not a pretty picture by any means. However, the idea that this nation finds itself in a position where it has no choice but to support actions that are far from the ideals in which this nation was built on is nothing less than a tragedy. It seems that we are slowly slipping further into the abyss of a world where compensation and award are being based on the needs of the disembodied masses, versus the abilities and achievements of the individual. There is something hidden under the surface that haunts us all, even if we don’t consciously understand it, in that one finds themselves in a ideological vacuum. Are we losing our ideology, our private and personal principles that drive us forward?  

Those on Capital Hill are either chastising or being chastised if one heads down any ideological pathway – and it has now become unfashionable or admittance to a lesser intellect if one holds to ‘an ideal’. Our leaders are preaching the contemporary notion that ideology is antiquated – a lesser aspect of human evolution. I am not sure when the seeds of this sentiment took root, but I refuse to ignore, or not be burdened by, my own personal hypocrisies and admit to myself that I have chosen to protect my 1,500 employees within my own organization and the wellbeing of my own family, and still hold true to the ideas embedded in my spirit that could not be abandoned even if I tried. I submit to the current and historical economic impossibilities and what needs to be done. However, in admitting these hypocrisies to myself I have also allowed myself an anchor in my ideological and philosophical principles that will continue to guide me and I will continue to instill these principles on my children or anyone I have the opportunity to positively influence.  

I would submit that ideology itself is one of the few things we have left to measure ‘real value’, and that no one should take it away or demoralize it, regardless of what steps our nation must take in these current economic challenges. Regardless of what ideals you cling to, don’t allow the world to suggest, teach or preach that it is wrong, unintelligent or an antiquated notion. We all arrived at this juncture together – we all played a role in it some way. Let’s not throw in the towel and give up on ourselves – our ability to naturally find solid ground. I for one will continue to believe in objective men, women and the next generation of gifted individuals that will make individually epic contributions of ingenuity and advancement to the human race. I applaud the brave few that dare stand and passionately sing their ideological song from the tops of all mountains, to share their ideas and take the leap of faith into wondering if their inventions will be accepted by the users. I hope that they will find enough encouragement within themselves to continue, as I believe there will be only a few in the future to pat them on the back. If you find yourself to be an individual believer among the masses that don’t even know what it means ‘to believe’ – you can call on me and I will be honored to be impressed by your enthusiasm, ingenuity and passion.  

→ No CommentsTags: PRMI related

del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com technorati.com   

Ok - Maybe Not

November 17th, 2008 · 2 Comments

An interesting turn of events occurred last week on behalf of the Treasury and Mr. Paulson’s latest address to the nation stating that the congressional bailout funds will not be utilized to purchase toxic mortgage assets from banks. Well - that pretty much shoots a big hole in my last blog – but I think in the end it’s a good thing.

Why are they doing this? They certainly aren’t saying much; simply, “We don’t owe anyone an apology due to the rapid changes in the financial markets and priority need for the bailout funds”. Ok, I’ll buy that – even though I would not have a choice otherwise. I think there is some hidden good news in this new path and the government is simply not ready to share it with the world just yet. But why? Because it would add additional confusion and debate as to why there was a bailout in the first place. I still agree that this action was absolutely necessary and the financial markets would have crumbled without it (a lot more than it already has). It now appear that there are a few new priorities for the money – or is it a matter of the “original priorities” are, all of a sudden, not as serious? I think it’s both, but let’s start with the later.  

I believe that with the new challenges facing the auto industry and the enormous potential for further increases in unemployment if this sector fails, coupled with an additional punch to the consumer, the government is being very mindful of where to utilize the bailout funds. More interesting, however, is that the Treasury, in its investigations of what mortgages to buy and from what banks, has found that the banks themselves are efficiently selling these assets at a break-neck pace to the private sector. And furthermore, the capital providers / buyers of these assets have built sophisticated production systems to aid in the organization and completion of the secondary transaction on the back-end – be it a refinance, Note modification or principle reduction of the mortgage, it seems to be working very well.  

How do you deleverage a bank? The concept is simple, but harder to actual put into practice. When a bank has too many loans on its book in accordance with its assets – you either need to raise capital (good luck in this market) or sell loans. I think the Treasury and the Fed recognize that both need to happen in tandem – and the selling is already taking place at a faster pace than they expected – or could ever compete with. So why not use the funds to help capitalize the banks to aid in the “priming of the pump”?  

This also gives the government more available funds to bail out other industries – like the auto industry. No, I am not a fan of this idea and it is troubling that it will occur. There is no stopping it now, but we can hope that they are smart enough to fix the massive ineptitude in the auto industry’s management and the screwed up union contracts. But where does it end? I really have no idea – and it is becoming more and more difficult to predict what is really going on out there.  

I have had the great fortune to have connections and friends throughout the world that have shared a lot of facts that simply are not making it to the media. I personally think it is getting better – and by leaps and bounds. It will take some time for this to bleed into the stabilization of the economy, housing, employment and the eventually benefit the consumer – there’s simply too much settling and work to be done at this time. However, the bottom is nearing and when it is upon us there is a sizable enough economy to witness growth and prosperity.  

May the ideas of capitalism still shine on America to enthusiastically promote the next generation entrepreneurs that will, no doubt, continue to save this country from slipping into something other than what we’ve fought so hard to achieve.  

→ 2 CommentsTags: PRMI related

del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com technorati.com   

An Obvious Solution

October 14th, 2008 · 2 Comments

 My colleagues and I agree that there is a solution that can be deployed by the US Treasury that will efficiently solve the $700 billion problem facing the government and our nation over the next few years. This solution is not only efficient to allow the Treasury to accomplish their goals, of stabilizing real estate values and financial markets, it can also be accomplished in astonishing speed and the public will not only accept the actions but will ultimately be the heroes due to their contribution as an essential ingredient in the execution of this much needed initiative – and mainly the middle class and low-to-moderate income families that have been perpetually stuck in the rental-pool of our nation’s economy.  

I am so convinced that this is the right thing to do that I will implore my readers to seriously consider the plan that I am about to lay out. I further implore that if you feel it is, in fact, the right plan to execute, to pass this message on to your friends and state representatives. Public opinion will be the driving influence to help the government do what is right. Why shouldn’t the public have a say in the matter? We are the ones paying for it. Our voices must be heard and the nation’s collective intellect will be what is needed to solve the nation’s downfall.  

This plan may seem extremely simplistic, but the more you consider it the more I believe you will recognize the layers upon layers of positive characteristics that will ensure maximum impact. Some areas may not seem fair to some, but has anything been fair in all of this? I intend to convince you that this is the only way to achieve the fairest outcome possible for all citizens of this great nation.  

I apologize for the extensive foundation that I am laying to support this plan and argument. I ask you to be patient with me while I explain a few fundamental characteristics of the core issue – value.  

  •       Fact: As long as real estate values are unstable, there is no possible way to solve this national dilemma.
  •       Fact: There is no possible way to stabilize real estate values as long as banks or the Treasury are forced to foreclose on defaulted mortgage loans.
  •       Fact: As long as the value of the paper that a mortgage loan is written on has no “marked value” real estate values will not have an ability to stabilize.
  •       Fact: These issues feed on one another to the extent that it is possible we could witness ten times the foreclosures, three times the unemployment rate and virtually no ability for the lower and middle class citizens of America to achieve the goal of home ownership for at least the next two decades.  

    The idea of “the haves” and “the have nots” would be drastically redefined will ultimately impact all of us either directly or indirectly. Just take a minute to think of friends, relatives or even your children that may not be able to buy a home and enjoy the “American Dream”. There is something very special about knowing that you own a piece of land – and the home that you live in. It goes back thousands of years to the essential and fundamental human senses of safety, wellbeing, and comfort that are the very essence of our global social structure as human beings. We must do everything we can to preserve the ability for all economic classes to have access to viable home ownership, which has been a passion of mine for over two decades. We are out of time and it is essential that the government acts promptly and accordingly to ensure that our nation remains strong and a land of opportunity for the masses – not just opportunity for the few. 

    Forget, for a moment, all the terminology that you’ve heard and just envision a $700 billion dollar stack of mortgage loans standing in front of us. Before you can do this, you will first need to stand way back - because the stack of one-inch-thick legal files that make up a standard mortgage loan stacked flat on top of each other would make a stack taller than 10 Mount Everests combined. We’re talking about a stack of loans more than 59 miles high. Boeing 737 typically fly, on average, about 6.5 miles above the earth – now times that by 9! Just take one single loan file off the stack and thumb through it. It’s a legal-sized manila-folder, about an inch of paper resting inside publishing an actual human being’s established economic and credit profile – a real person paying on one single real mortgage. Hold on to that file for a moment and we’ll get back to it in just a minute. 

    I want you to imagine that you are looking way up to the top of this stack of files (you’re going to need a telescope to do so), now picture the top twelve percent of the stack – the last 7 miles. This represents the amount of mortgage loans that are in default – but not necessarily in foreclosure. The rest of the stack is loan files that are performing or sub-performing (meaning payments are paid on-time, or almost on time). The entire stack is made up of real people, with real challenges. Yes, they should be responsible for their actions as these people did not have the ability to judge for themselves what their limits were. Was it the lender’s fault or the borrower’s fault? I think it was both – but this article is not intended to focus on blame, but more to focus on a solution. How do we get that enormous stack of loans paying on time and stay paying on time – and, ultimately, get the entire tax payer dollars paid back to them rapidly? Quite a task, if I do say so myself.  

    Now let’s assume that the names on the loan papers within the file are Jack and Jill Everest. Let’s assume that they are only one month behind on their mortgage, they love their home, they need a home for themselves and their children and would do just about anything they could to keep it that way. However, two major questions keep banging at their heads every morning, day and night. First, how much of this can we take? And second, what is our home even worth?  

    The first question is due to the fact that their rate was just dramatically raised and they can barely afford the payment, which is drastically impeding their lifestyle. The second question has arisen simply due to the fact that the borrower heard that the government just purchased their Mortgage Note for pennies on the dollar (anywhere between 50 cents to 80 cents on the dollar). If the actual Mortgage Note is only worth cents on the dollar, what could their home actually be worth, and in turn, what are they fighting for? This is, in fact, the Genesis of the issue at hand – what is the value? There is a major disconnect and misunderstanding of “financial paper value” and actual “real estate – or real value”. It’s very simple – if a bank is motivated enough to raise cash by selling assets (Mortgage Notes) at a massive discount, we shouldn’t abandon the idea that the actual real estate that acts as collateral behind the Mortgage Note has dropped as well. In fact, the value of your home is based solely off of one simple notion – what will someone else pay for your home if you put it up on the market? Now, when there is a large supply of similar homes in your area, and at the same time there are only a handful of potential buyers – sellers must provide incentives or reduced prices to win the buyer. This is simple “supply-and-demand” in action, which is the other side of the coin in this turbulent real estate cycle. If the homeowners, Jack and Jill Everest, finally give up based on an inability to perform on the new or adjusted terms of their Mortgage Note, or simply misunderstand the “true value” of their home and abandon ship – this increases the supply of homes on the market (more choices for the home buyers) and ultimately plays into further real estate price declines.  

    Look back at that massive stack of mortgages that is the 700 billion pound gorilla in the room (and the room is the Treasury Department). What if every single one of those mortgages, including Mr. and Mrs. Everest’s, had an interest rate of less than 1%? Remember, these are real mortgage loans, real people – people that want their home. I can pretty much guarantee you that most of the loans would perform until the home was sold (average in the U.S. within 8 years – and we’ll touch on that further as we go on), or until every single payment has been paid and the Mortgage Note is paid off. Wait a minute – we just found something here that is very important, and that is the actual value and principal balance of the Mortgage Note! We’ve all been hearing, “these Mortgage Notes are only worth so many cents on the dollar” – and that sentiment is, in fact, the poison that will take us all down. Forget the notion that the Treasury needs to sell these mortgage loan assets for more than they purchased them for – that is ridiculous – it just can’t happen! What the Treasury must do is stabilize the actual principal amount of the mortgage itself by creating a way for the borrower to successfully perform on it. Look, everyone pretty much has the notion that at some point in time the value of their home will go back up in price and everything will eventually stabilize. But what the problem is now, if Mr. and Mrs. Everest lose their home – is it will be 15 to 20 years before they will ever be able to qualify for a home again – and that is an epidemic just months away from becoming reality – regardless of the government’s intervention.  

    By stabilizing the individual borrower and helping to create the ability for this massive stack of mortgages to be paid on-time by modifying their current interest rate to less than 1%, the Treasury will, in an instant, nail “value” to the wall – they would be able to prove that the value of a $150,000 mortgage is in fact worth $150,000. Who cares what it would sell for in the secondary market – just DON’T sell it! If the borrower is performing on the full balance successfully, the US Treasury has a responsibility to the tax payers of America to service these mortgages until the borrower sells their home or reaches maturity. Of course families would keep their homes for much longer with a rate of only 1% or less – but I would argue that at least sixty percent of the portfolio would payoff or mature within the first ten years – and the rest would trickle down over the remaining twenty years. This would guarantee a lot of things;

    1. A drastic decrease in foreclosures,
    2. Tax payers would eventually get at least the original $700 billion back over time – par is a good thing,
    3. Millions of families would have new found discretionary money that would, no doubt, bleed into the economy – and I am talking trillions!

     For the first time “trickle down economics” would be a useful economic stimulus emanating from middle and lower income families instead of the customary higher-income corporations.  

    You may be wondering – what if the borrower still can’t afford the house payment even at a 1% or below interest rate? This is where it really gets interesting. My first job in mortgage lending back in 1988 consisted partly of processing the paperwork on what are known as “FHA Fully Qualified – or Simple Assumptions”. A borrower wanting to assume another person’s mortgage (buying a home from family, friends or neighbors), if the terms of the underlying mortgage on the property was better for the new homeowner than the current market rates and terms, they could request that the servicing mortgage lender allow them to “assume” the underlying mortgage. In this case, I often witnessed the current owner relinquishing the current equity, if any, and allowed the new owner to assume the mortgage with no down payment – or very little down payment. The cost of the actual assumption, if memory serves me, was about $550.  

    Now I ask you – (on Treasury held mortgages) for the group of borrowers that still cannot afford the mortgage even at a rate as low as 1% – how fast would they become consumed by the public if the public was able to assume these mortgages at a 1% interest rate with an extremely low payment - and zero down payment? All that they would be required to do is to qualify under the most liberal lending terms in the world (FHA lending guidelines) and come up with the $550 assumption fee. I’ve tested the acceptance of this theory with anyone and everyone I have come across – colleagues, family members, people I’ve sat next to on airplanes. They all say the same thing, “sign me up – I will take one now”! And guess what – they would not only qualify, they would cherish and pay every payment on a once in a lifetime opportunity for millions of families to buy a home – there very own piece of America – the American dream! Why do we need to allow this “bail out” and national problem to make it virtually impossible for many Americans citizens to improve their living standards and or buy a home, when the government has an opportunity to allow, for the first time, these same citizens to be the heroes and save our nation’s real estate values?  

    I spent about an hour making a list of friends and family members that I knew that would benefit from this initiative and take advantage of such an opportunity, and I came up with 11 families – just me! If you think about it for a minute yourself I believe you will have a similar outcome – even if you would not utilize the program yourself. Millions of families would rush to apply for such an opportunity – and a great number of Americans would, no doubt, qualify.  

    Let’s spend just a few minutes on fulfillment of such a program. A huge problem with this $700 billion bail out package is that no one, even the Treasury themselves, even know how they are going to deal with all of the paperwork and management of the behemoth task of purchasing these mortgage – but more servicing them and trying to sell them back into the secondary market at a profit – or break even. However, the plan I have suggested above allows for many working parts to naturally work in harmony – it practically solves itself. For one, there are many mortgage lending fulfillment operations (hundreds of them in fact) that could aid the Treasury in the assumption process and earn the $550 assumption fee as a revenue source. The Treasury could also make a demand on the financial institution that they purchased the loan from to complete the assumption paperwork. If the institution had the ability to make the mortgage in the first place, they sure as Sunday can complete the assumption paperwork. In addition, there should be no appraisal requirements on these transactions – so all the credit package consists of is the borrower’s credit, income documents and proof of the $550 fee.  

    Please remember that we are fighting fire with fire here. In addition, this is not a new concept. The FHA had, in the past (not sure what the HUD Repo terms are now) been selling thousands of homes per year to the American public under their “HUD Repo Program”, whereas potential homeowners bid on the property and the winner takes all – as long as they could qualify under FHA income with very liberal credit guidelines and agreed to the value being what they agreed to pay for the property – even if it was purchased for more than the home is worth. It was a hugely successful program – and this was another one of the programs that I processed in my early days in mortgage lending back in the late 80’s and early 90’s. Why was it so successful? Simple - because people were able to buy a home with only a few hundred dollars for the “processing costs” and basically take over the property. The FHA figured that anyone willing to buy the home that had a stable income was better than the home being vacant – regardless of what the loan-to-value (LTV) was at the time. They were right – and it drastically helped to stabilize markets! 

    The public has lent $700 billion to the government so that they could buy a whole bunch of these mortgages from banks. If they buy them and the value continues to fall, and there is no one interested in “stabilizing the value” by staying in the home, buying the home and ultimately performing on the Mortgage Note – the values will continue to fall drastically (both the financial paper and the real estate values) and, at the end of the day, the American tax payer will lose in two extreme way. First, the Treasury will not be able to stabilize the paper value, or keep people in their homes that can’t afford them – and that $700 billion will start to drastically devalue and dwindle. If this happens, there is no possible way that the government can “give it back”, as they have made so clear in promises. And second, as more foreclosures in your neighborhoods occur, the buyers will have more choices, there will be more supply on the market and ultimately the prices of real estate will continue to fall. Basically – your largest asset, your home, will go down in value. So I ask you these two questions; first, do you want the money back that you lent the government to solve this problem? And second, do you want to vote for a program that allows the people in this massive pool of mortgages to stay in their homes, mow their lawns, pay their payments and drastically help keep the foreclosure numbers down? 

    I know it’s a big pill to swallow. It is not fair for the responsible citizen that didn’t borrow too much, or accepted a risky loan program and has always paid their payments on time to condone a program that rewards the citizens that did not practice such self-control. It took me a lot of soul searching to answer that question for myself – and I almost did not write this blog. I would never expect anyone in the US to simply think this is the right way to do it. This is an obvious solution – and by no means would I ever ask the public to accept it without some contempt and frustration. If the government is going to jump in, borrower $700 billion from the public and try to solve this problem – we had better let everyone involved go all the way to make the maximum impact in this bail out initiative. If they sit around and try to figure out how to market these mortgages and don’t do something fast to keep people in their homes, or try to get others in the home on the same mortgage – there are some big troubles still ahead. Remember the 59 mile high stack of mortgages. This will not simply go away now that the government has purchased these mortgages – or working on a plan to do so. What’s the next step after that is completed? The answer to that question is totally unknown – especially to the Treasury Department itself. The plan above is the only way to stabilize the value of the paper and the real estate that it is written on. With millions of people staying in their homes and others buying these homes on “FHA style fully qualified assumptions” – trillions of dollars of spending would trickle into the economy – saving jobs and improving the nation’s current uncertainty. This plan makes sense. It will work if only it could become a reality. 

    I ask that you consider this plan for a few days before you pass judgment on it. I believe you will find the same acceptance of it that I and many other good citizens I know have done with vigor. Once you have – we then need to act! Public opinion will be a huge driver in the decisions that are made in Washington, DC when constructing and executing their plans to deal with this $700 billion dollar challenge. If we all send this article to our friends, neighbors and relatives that value their current equity and would like to see millions of good citizens have a “one-time-only shot” at home-ownership (that could also be passed on to their children) –  I believe this message can be sent far and wide. We need to write to our congressmen and urge them to share this plan with the Treasury Department. If there are enough US citizens demanding that a program such as this at least be considered – they cannot afford not to act on it, or at the very least seriously consider it.  

    I appreciate your willingness to read this lengthy article and proposal. If you reach out and grab a loan file off of that huge stack you will find that these are real people, with real problems. These problems will not simple “stay in the stack”, but will actually spread into every neighborhood in the nation and burden the world economy for decades if the right steps are not taken. I believe that if this plan is executed there are very few negatives that will come of it, except the unfair aspects that are no doubt an ugly reality. But, the alternative reality is a much bigger pill to swallow – and with that pill I assure you none of us will have a choice. Pass this onto a friend or relative and make our voices heard!

  • → 2 CommentsTags: PRMI related

    del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com technorati.com   
    Enter Your Email Address
    SUBSCRIBE
    SEARCH

    Syndicate this blog


    Google Reader or Homepage
    Add to My Yahoo!

    Add to Technorati Favorites!

    Blogroll

    Categories

    Recent Posts